Shipping lines

The ten largest shipping companies in the world, and what the ranking does not tell you.

Ten carriers operate 84.1% of the world's container capacity. Every list of them ranks the same way, by fleet size. Fleet size is not what determines whether your shipment arrives when someone said it would — in July 2026, 56.4% of container ships worldwide arrived inside their advertised window.

The ranking, as it stands

Carriers are ranked by operated TEU capacity— the total container slots across the ships a group runs, whether it owns them or charters them. A TEU is one twenty-foot container; a standard household shipment in a sole-use forty-foot container occupies two of them. The figures below are Alphaliner’s, as reported for 4 January 2026.

Container lines by operated capacity, Alphaliner, 4 January 2026
CarrierCapacity (TEU)Share of world fleetAllianceBased
1. MSC7.136m21.2%IndependentSwitzerland
2. Maersk4.612m13.7%Gemini CooperationDenmark
3. CMA CGM Group4.140m12.3%Ocean AllianceFrance
4. COSCO Shipping Lines3.586m10.6%Ocean AllianceChina
5. Hapag-Lloyd2.390m7.1%Gemini CooperationGermany
6. Ocean Network Express (ONE)2.078m6.2%Premier AllianceSingapore / Japan
7. Evergreen Marine1.958m5.8%Ocean AllianceTaiwan
8. HMM1.027m3.0%Premier AllianceSouth Korea
9. Yang Ming Marine Transport0.760m2.3%Premier AllianceTaiwan
10. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services0.758m2.2%IndependentIsrael

The concentration at the top is easy to underread. MSC operates 2,524,000 TEU more than Maersk in second place — a gap larger than the entire fleet of Hapag-Lloyd in fifth, and more than three times the whole of Yang Ming in ninth. The top three alone hold 47.2% of world capacity.

Operated capacity, and the gap the ranking hides
CARRIER GROUPOPERATED CAPACITY, TEU02m4m6m8m2,524,000 TEU between 1st and 2nd1. MSC7,136,0002. Maersk4,612,0003. CMA CGM Group4,140,0004. COSCO Shipping Lines3,586,0005. Hapag-Lloyd2,390,0006. Ocean Network Express (ONE)2,078,0007. Evergreen Marine1,958,0008. HMM1,027,0009. Yang Ming Marine Transport760,00010. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services758,000All other operators5,245,000the first-to-second gap — wider than this whole fleetWorld fleet 33.690m TEU across 7,498 ships. The ten rows sum to 28,445,000 TEU.
Bars share a zero baseline and show operated TEU capacity as reported by Alphaliner for 4 January 2026. The hatched bar is the residual: world fleet (33.690m TEU) less the ten rows above it, so it covers every operator outside the top ten rather than any single company.

Those ten rows sum to 28,445,000 TEU, against a world fleet of 33.690m TEU across 7,498ships. Alphaliner’s own headline for the same release is 28,348,000 TEU, or 84.1% of world capacity. The 97,000 TEU difference is a rounding artefact — per-carrier figures are published to the nearest thousand and a fleet changes daily — and we mention it because a page about accurate numbers should explain its own.

Why two “top ten” lists disagree

Search for this ranking and you will find versions that contradict each other. Usually neither is wrong: they consolidate differently. Alphaliner counts subsidiary brands towards the parent group, so a shipment moving on an APL bill of lading counts towards CMA CGM, and one on Hamburg Süd counts towards Maersk. A list that treats those as separate carriers produces a different order.

This matters beyond trivia. If a moving company tells you your container is booked with a line you cannot find in any ranking, it is very often a consolidated brand rather than an obscure operator.

Subsidiary brands consolidated into their parent group
GroupAlso trades as
MSCWEC Lines, Log-In Logística
MaerskMaersk A/S, Hamburg Süd, Aliança, Sealand Asia, Sealand Americas, Sealand Europe & Med
CMA CGM GroupCMA CGM, APL, ANL, CNC, CoMaNav, Containerships, MacAndrews, Mercosul Line, SoFrana
COSCO Shipping LinesCOSCO Shipping Lines, OOCL, Shanghai Pan Asia Shipping, Diamond Line
Hapag-LloydNileDutch, DAL, former UASC fleet
Evergreen MarineEvergreen Line, Italia Marittima
ZIM Integrated Shipping ServicesGold Star Line
Find the group behind a name on your paperwork

Type a carrier or brand name. This index covers the ten largest groups and the brands consolidated into them.

Built from Alphaliner’s published consolidation rules for 10 groups, as reported for 4 January 2026. It answers which group operates a brand. It is not a verification that a booking exists, a statement about who holds your contract, or an endorsement — and alliance sharing means the ship carrying a container is frequently operated by a different member of the same alliance.

The number the rankings leave out

Fleet size tells you how much a carrier can move. It tells you nothing about whether a ship turns up on the day the schedule says. That measure is called schedule reliability: the share of vessel arrivals landing inside the advertised window. Sea-Intelligence publishes it monthly, and it is close to absent from articles ranking the same carriers by size.

For July 2026, global schedule reliability was 56.4% — down 6.1 percentage points on the month and 8.8 on the year. Ships that did arrive late averaged 6.06 days behind schedule.

Schedule reliability, Sea-Intelligence Global Liner Performance, July 2026
MeasureFigureWhat it means for a shipment
All carriers worldwide56.4%Roughly two ships in five missed their advertised arrival window
Most reliable (Maersk)73.7%Still around one arrival in four outside the window
Second (Hapag-Lloyd)69.3%Both leaders are Gemini Cooperation members
Least reliable (Wan Hai)29.8%Fewer than one arrival in three inside the window
Average delay when late6.06 daysThe buffer a realistic delivery plan needs, before destination handling
What 56.4% schedule reliability looks like as ships
100 VESSEL ARRIVALS, JULY 202656 arrived inside the windowThe advertised arrival held.44 did notRoughly two arrivals in every five.Late arrivals ran 6.06 days behind scheduleon average, before any destination handling.Down 6.1 points on the previous monthand 8.8 points on the same month a year earlier.
Unit array: one square is one vessel arrival in a hundred, not one ship. Squares are rounded to whole units from 56.4%, Sea-Intelligence Global Liner Performance, July 2026. The array shows how often an arrival landed inside its advertised window, not how late the others were; the average lateness is stated separately because it is a different measurement.

The spread is the point. Between the most and least reliable carrier in a single month there is a gap of 43.9 percentage points. Neither the best nor the worst performer is the largest carrier, and the two most reliable are not the two biggest. Size and punctuality are separate properties.

The spread the global average hides
ARRIVALS INSIDE THE ADVERTISED WINDOW0%25%50%75%100%Maersk 2nd largest carrier73.7%Hapag-Lloyd 5th largest carrier69.3%All carriers worldwide the figure the headlines quote56.4%Wan Hai outside the top ten by size29.8%43.9 pointsbetween best and worst, in one month
Each row is one carrier's schedule reliability for July 2026, Sea-Intelligence Global Liner Performance. Sea-Intelligence named these carriers in that release; the remaining top-ten carriers are absent from the chart because a figure was not published for them, not because they sit anywhere in particular. The dashed rule is the worldwide figure, drawn on the same scale.
Apply the published reliability figures to your own date
ARRIVED IN WINDOW56.4%
ARRIVED LATE43.6%

19 September 2026 + 6 days = 25 September 2026

If this shipment falls in the 43.6% that ran late, the July 2026 average lateness of 6.06 days would put vessel arrival near25 September 2026The industry-wide figure. Use this when you do not know which line is carrying the shipment, which is the usual case.
Changing the benchmark moves the probability but not the date, and that is deliberate rather than a fault: Sea-Intelligence Global Liner Performance publishes reliability per carrier, but the 6.06-day average lateness is an industry-wide figure. We have no per-carrier lateness to apply, so we do not invent one. A base rate, not a prediction. It applies Sea-Intelligence Global Liner Performance’s published July 2026 figures — 56.4% of arrivals worldwide inside the advertised window, and an average 6.06 days late for those that missed it — to a date you already hold. It knows nothing about your vessel, route, port pair or shipment, and reliability is republished monthly. This is vessel arrival at the destination port, not delivery to your door. Destination handling, release and the delivery appointment all sit after it — see international moving times. Not a quotation, a commitment or a service level.

The alliances matter more than the rank

Carriers share vessels through alliances, so the line that sold the slot is frequently not the line whose ship carries the box. The groupings were rebuilt in February 2025, when the 2M partnership between Maersk and MSC ended.

Container shipping alliances from February 2025
AllianceMembersWhy it matters
Gemini CooperationMaersk, Hapag-LloydFormed February 2025 after the 2M partnership between Maersk and MSC ended. Built around a hub-and-spoke network, which is the stated reason for its schedule-reliability lead.
Ocean AllianceCMA CGM Group, COSCO Shipping Lines, OOCL, Evergreen MarineThe only grouping unchanged through the 2025 reshuffle, with membership committed to 2032.
Premier AllianceOcean Network Express (ONE), HMM, Yang Ming Marine TransportThe former THE Alliance, renamed and continuing after Hapag-Lloyd left for Gemini.
IndependentMSC, ZIM Integrated Shipping ServicesMSC operates the largest fleet in the industry without an alliance partner, having chosen not to replace 2M.
The same capacity, grouped by alliance instead of by carrier
TOP-TEN CAPACITY, 28,445,000 TEUA34.0%B27.8%C24.6%D13.6%THE SAME FOUR BLOCS, BROKEN INTO MEMBER CARRIERSA · Ocean Alliance9.684m TEU, 34.0% of the tenCMA CGM Group 4.140m · COSCO Shipping Lines 3.586m · Evergreen Marine 1.958mB · Independent7.894m TEU, 27.8% of the tenMSC 7.136m · ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 0.758mC · Gemini Cooperation7.002m TEU, 24.6% of the tenMaersk 4.612m · Hapag-Lloyd 2.390mD · Premier Alliance3.865m TEU, 13.6% of the tenOcean Network Express (ONE) 2.078m · HMM 1.027m · Yang Ming Marine Transport 0.760mONE CARRIER AGAINST ONE WHOLE BLOC, SAME SCALEB7.136m TEUMSC — one carrierD3.865m TEUPremier Alliance — 3 carriers
All bars share one scale: the full width is the 28.445m TEU operated by the ten carriers above, so any segment can be compared against any other segment in the figure. Letters A to D repeat the colour so the grouping never depends on hue alone. Alliance membership is as constituted from February 2025; capacity is Alphaliner, 4 January 2026. Shared vessel operation is not shared ownership — the split shows who operates the ships, not who sold the slot.

The practical consequence: booking with a Gemini member does not guarantee a Gemini ship on every leg, and a delay on a shared service affects every carrier selling space on it. When a schedule slips, the question worth asking is which service the container is on, not which brand issued the paperwork.

What this means for a household move

Almost nobody moving a home contracts with these carriers directly. Household shipments are booked through moving companies and consolidators who hold the relationship with the line. You will generally not choose your carrier, and a mover promising a specific one is describing an intention rather than a guarantee — space is allocated when the shipment is ready, not when the quote is signed.

That does not make the ranking useless. It tells you which names should be recognisable on your documents, and the reliability data tells you what to build into a plan. Ask these questions instead of asking for a carrier by name.

Questions that are answerable, in place of asking for a carrier by name
AskWhy it is the better questionWhat a useful answer contains
Which service and routing is the shipment planned on?A routing with transhipment has more points at which a schedule can move than a direct serviceNamed load port, discharge port and whether a transfer is expected
Is the advertised transit time a sailing time or a door-to-door estimate?Sailing time excludes collection, consolidation, destination release and the delivery appointmentA separate figure for each stage
What happens to my delivery date if the vessel is a week late?Late arrivals averaged 6.06 days in July 2026, so this is a normal case, not a worst caseHow you are told, and how the delivery appointment is rebooked
Is my shipment shared or sole-use?Shared shipments wait for consolidation, which adds a dependency before the ship is even relevantExpected consolidation window and what triggers dispatch
Who do I contact when the schedule changes?The carrier will not talk to you; the relationship sits with whoever booked the spaceA named point of contact and an update interval

Our guide to international moving times sets out the stages a door-to-door estimate has to cover, and comparing moving quotes explains how to check that two estimates describe the same scope.

How these figures were compiled

Capacity figures are Alphaliner’s consolidated operated-capacity ranking as reported for 4 January 2026, cross-checked against two independent write-ups of the same release which agree on the leading positions and the combined total. Schedule reliability is from Sea-Intelligence’s Global Liner Performance report covering July 2026, published 27 August 2026. Alliance membership is as constituted from February 2025.

Capacity rankings change continuously as ships are delivered, chartered and redelivered, and schedule reliability is republished monthly. Treat every figure here as carrying the date attached to it rather than as a live number. We revisit the page when a top-ten position changes hands, when monthly reliability moves by more than five percentage points, or when an alliance membership changes.

We have no commercial relationship with any carrier named on this page, and no carrier pays for its position in the table or the way it is described.

Your international move, clearly managed.

Start with your locations, timing and what you’re taking.

Plan your move